WHAT CHANGES FOR THE CUP?


         

 Alinghi outlines changes (05/02/03)
 (source : Alinghi)

By winning the title of "Defender" for the next America's Cup, the Société Nautique de Genève, represented by Team Alinghi, has also acquired the weighty privilege of organising the 32nd edition of the competition, and in so doing, takes on the writing of the Protocol.

This document defines all the aspects of the competition, from the format of the regatta, up to the use of the materials for the construction of the boat. Since the announcement of the new Protocol, Team Alinghi has positioned itself evenly between tradition and modernism.

All the announced modifications are supported in article 2, decreed by the Team: "The general underlying purpose and intent of this Protocole shall be to promote a competitive sporting regatta for all Competitors, to realise the commercial and sporting potential of the America's Cup and to encourage worldwide growth and interest in the America's Cup as the premier event in the sport of sailing, consistent with the provisions of the Deed of Gift."

In the course of different meetings between the challengers, the International Jury, the Race Committee or the arbitration panel and the officials of CORM, the management of the Team revisited this document, identifying the transformations seen as favorable to the development of the event.

Are we speaking of a revolution, no - but perhaps of reform - to illuminate certain areas of potential that have yet to be capitalized upon until today, certainly.

The venue for the competition


The Société Nautique de Genève has endeavored (via the services of AC Management, a new structure put in place in order to manage the event side of the America's Cup) to research a location that will provide security for the sporting side of the competition. In other words, the wind must blow on the racecourse without reprieve, which will enable the competitors to concentrate on what is essential once the competition has begun - the art of the duel.

The objective is clear. To ensure that the word "postponement" disappears from the racing calendar, a mention that appeared too often in the unfolding of the 31st America's Cup.

For the moment, eight cities are under consideration (Barcelona, Palma de Mallorca, Valencia, Lisbon, Naples, Genoa, Porto Cervo, and Marseille.) AC Management will announce the names of the four candidates that will remain in the running during the month of May. Also note that the competition's venue in Europe will greatly facilitate the logistics of the challengers.

The nationality and residence rule


The Cup remains a competition between the yacht clubs of different nations. The rule of nationality or residence, applied to the sailors and the designers, was cause for debate during the last America's Cup.

From now on this rule shall be repealed. Has the ax fallen on tradition? Not truly - we have often heard used as an example the story of Charlie Barr. His Scandinavian crew possessed nothing of anglo-saxon origins, except for the language spoken onboard.

However, the Protocol does anticipate certain restrictions. A team member who sails with one challenger during the 18 months preceding the start of the competition - whatever the type of race - cannot take afterwards a position with another challenger.

With regard to the designers, they cannot change syndicates after signing a contract with one of the competitors.

The boats and the technology


One of the innovations of the 32nd Cup resides in the fact that a veto has been levied on the rule regarding the transfer of technology. In effect, up until the last America's Cup, a Challenger was able to purchase a boat but could not access the plans, nor the information relating to its performance.

Yes, the team could see that a boat performed well in certain conditions, but the design teams had to spend long hours trying to figure out "why" the boat performed the way it did. Therefore, the developments were done almost blindly. As such, the designers held a tool in their hands, but they did so without knowing what the boat's limits were, which resulted in breakage during training as well as sagas in the jury room.

Nevertheless, the task will remain to determine who, whether it is the Challenger or the architectural advisor, has the right to sell these documents.

The origin of the boat

The rules have relaxed in this domain as well. The previous Protocol specified that the boat, as well as its components, had to be built in the Challenger's country of origin. Now, we know that the transportation of the boats is being done in "detachable pieces," delivered to the competition venue, including with the cost implications of transporting a 25-tonnes bulb!

From now on, only the boat's hull is required to have a "certificate of origin." The other components of the boat can be built on site, at the location of the competition, or in the country chosen by the competitor.

In the next parts, Alinghi will outline what new economic and commercial forms and the structural modifications in the organisation of the competition.
 

 Alinghi releases new Protocol (03/04/03)
 (source : America's Cup)

The Swiss Société Nautique de Genève, whose Alinghi Team won the America’s Cup two days ago, and its Challenger of Record, the Golden Gate Yacht Club represented by the Oracle BMW Racing Team, released details of the Protocol for the next America’s Cup on Tuesday evening in Auckland.

No details were given on the date of the next event, or the venue, apart from the provision that the America’s Cup will be contested on European waters. Full details for dates and venue will be specified on or before 15th December, 2003.

The XXXIInd Cup Protocol envisions major changes to the way the America’s Cup is organised, with notable differences in the Format of the Regatta, nationality requirements, technology transfer restrictions, the Jury and the organising authority.

Among the things that stay the same are the class of boat to be used, the windward-leeward race course and the provision that teams cannot name their boat in a way that constitutes advertising, One of the more crowd pleasing changes is sure to be concerning the ‘unveiling’ rule. All teams must unveil their boats before the start of racing.

The regatta format will include pre-regattas beginning as early as the summer of 2003, and include fleet races involving the Defender before the America’s Cup proper. These races will have minimal impact on the later regatta, but will count to a small extent.

The Protocol envisions the America’s Cup beginning with a fleet race to determine (along with the results of previous regattas) seeding for a Round Robin elimination series.

At least the top eight Challengers will survive the Round Robins and advance through to a knock-out series to select the eventual Challenger. The America’s Cup Match will continue to be a best of nine series.

Nationality and residency requirements for personnel have been completely dropped from the Protocol. But individuals once aligned with one syndicate may not work for another syndicate.

The rules governing the transfer of technology have also been relaxed. Teams will be able to purchase old design information up until October 2004, and at any time, design information can be included with the purchase of an old boat. That being said, newly generated design information cannot be shared across teams.

Perhaps the largest change is in the structure of the organising authority that runs the America’s Cup. For the first time, there will be just one body responsible for both the Challenger selection series and the America’s Cup.

The Protocol envisions the Defender, the Société Nautique de Genève will establish an Event Authority, charged with managing all the funds raised through sponsorship, media rights, merchandising etc.

After a 10 per cent management fee, this money will be used to run the regatta. Any surplus revenue will be split between the Defender, and all of the Challengers.

The Challenger of Record and the Defender will appoint a Jury and a Regatta Director. The latter, responsible for on-the-water activities, will appoint a race committee, a Chief Umpire, and, in collaboration with the chief measurer, a measurement committee.

The Jury will arbitrate all disputes except those that are measurement related. There will be no Arbitration Panel.

Reaction to this protocol is initially favourable amongst the Cup community.
 

 Oracle Racing is the new Challenger of record (03/02/03)
 (source : Alinghi)

As the Swiss challenger Alinghi crossed the finish line today to win the America's Cup for the Société Nautique de Genève (SNG), Commodore Pierre-Yves Firmenich received a formal challenge for the next Cup from the Golden Gate Yacht Club (GGYC) of San Francisco.

GGYC, the club which backed Larry Ellison's Oracle BMW Racing Team in the 2003 competition, becomes the "Challenger of Record" for the 32nd America's Cup.

The Challenger of Record negotiates the rules for the next event with the Defender, representing the interests of all eventual challengers.

Commodore Pierre Yves Firmenich said, "Société Nautique de Genève is proud to be taking the Cup event back to Europe for the first time since 1851. It is a great honor to have Golden Gate Yacht Club, and Mr. Ellison's Oracle BMW Racing Team, as partners with our club, Ernesto Bertarelli and team Alinghi as we go forward with planning for the next event."

Bill Erkelens, ORACLE BMW Racing's General Manager, said that the negotiations between SNG and GGYC representatives had gone smoothly.

"Ernesto Bertarelli and Larry Ellison share the same vision and values for modernizing the Cup. Everyone connected with our Club and Oracle BMW are excited to be working with Societe Nautique de Geneve and Alinghi as their Challenger of Record."

A press conference will be held on Tuesday, March 4 at the Alinghi Base in Auckland, New Zealand to announce details of the "Protocol" which describes the challenge details and other ground rules for the next America's Cup event.
 

 Alinghi could reward Oracle with CoR role (03/01/03)
 (source : Sailing Anarchy)

In one of the most crucial off-the-water decisions of the five-month America's Cup regatta, Alinghi decides which syndicate becomes Challenger of Record. Swiss syndicate could reward Oracle with this powerful America's Cup role.

If it wins the cup, Alinghi has to announce the Challenger of Record when it wins the deciding race.

The recent rumours suggested that Oracle and Alinghi have done a back room deal ensuring that Oracle will be the Challenger of Record for the XXXII America's Cup.

The Challenger of Record is a pivotal position because it negotiates with the defender over the organisation of the next cup regatta, including consideration of possible widespread changes.

This deal has numerous implications, and will present some very interesting potential scenarios for the next go around. It would appear that the AC is about to head in a new direction.
 

 The next Cup would be similar if Team NZ win (02/27/03)
 (source : Stuff.co.nz)

It was said Bertarelli had a strategy to "professionalise" the cup, making it better organised and more appealing to commercial sponsors, television and the public.

From NZ point of view, America's Cup executive director Tony Thomas gave an assurance that if Team New Zealand retained the America's Cup, the next series would be similar to the present event.

The main change he would look for next time would be to bring the commercial aspects of the challengers' Louis Vuitton Cup and the America's Cup closer together. That could involve bringing such things as sponsorship and television rights into one organisation.

The impression he had from Alinghi was that if they won the cup they would like to bring the sport under one organisation, which they would want to control.

"I don't know what the challengers would think of having a challenger series that might be run by the defender... but I think there would be a lot of commercial sense in it," he said.

"But from a sporting point of view, if you're a traditionalist, the challengers run their series and the defenders runs their series... that's been running for 150 years".

"I think people are making suggestions, but they're not necessarily understanding the sport," he said. "It's a challenger-driven regatta,".

"When it (the cup) came to New Zealand it changed and it changed for the better", he said. "And if it goes to Europe it will change again. It will be an evolving event." The cup would be a bigger event in Europe than it was here, he explained.

Any move to eliminate challengers early would suit the team defending the cup because their opposition would have less competition.

"The approach we've always taken in New Zealand is the more challenges we have in New Zealand, the better it is for New Zealand." Thomas cautioned about taking away the core values of the America's Cup.

Another comment on Sunday by Prince Albert, a member of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), was that it would be an "excellent idea" and an "interesting and symbolic link" if the IOC and its structures were to help Alinghi, should they win the cup, in their dealings with the next host venue.

The guidelines used by the IOC in choosing host venues for summer and winter Olympic Games could be a meaningful model, once adapted for the America's Cup, he said.

His comments follow those of IOC president Jacques Rogge, made during a visit to Auckland last December, that an independent and neutral ruling organisation was needed for the America's Cup.

Alinghi spokesman Bernard Schopfer said the syndicate were making no comment on their plans for now.