|
It has been suggested Alinghi
may be doing something with their keel to give them
a speed edge in June.
One of the teams asked the measurer questions in
relation to stiffening or supporting the keel fin.
While the measurer answered "no" to a lot of the
questions, BMW Oracle Racing designer Bruce Farr
BMW worries that one of his rivals has found a way
around the wording of the design rules and used
the example of Team New Zealand's hull appendage
in the last cup as something the rule never intended
to allow.
"In the past the rule has been pretty liberally
interpreted in some areas and not really kept true
to its extent," said Farr, who helped create the
America's Cup Class Rule in the early 1990s. "One
worries that someone has found a way around the
wording in the rules that allows them to do something
that clearly the rules didn't intended to allow."
When asked if he'd spotted anything on the Alinghi
boats to suggest they had conquered the problem
of the keel fin deflecting, Farr pointed to a slight
bulge near the top of the fin.
"I see something on those boats. There is a shape-change
line about 30cm down from the hull on the keel,
where you can see a change in the surface shape
of the keel fin, which looks a little strange to
me and indicates that there is something happening
there".
"It may just be some change in the structural design
of the keel at that point that requires taper and
widening above there. It could be a sign there is
something going on."
When asked what, Farr said: "There is two things
you might try to do to get an advantage with some
kind of a controlled structural defamation or linkage
of forces. One would be to have the keel drop vertically
to become deeper to increase the stability of the
boat. The other would be to try to offset the rotation
of the keel so instead of deflecting to leeward
and losing stability when the boat heels over, it
is somehow made to turn in the opposite direction,
like a canting keel, to increase the stability of
the boat."
Would either of those concepts hand a team a huge
advantage?
"If it is a significant amount [of change], yes,"
Farr said. But the first question is, is someone
doing it? The second is, would it survive a serious
protest?
"Certainly there seems to be a lot of hope around
it and given the interpretations that have been
done, someone has been thinking about trying to
do something to make keels work in a better way
than the objectives of the rule would have anticipated."
|