|
The validity of the Club Nautico
Espanol de Vela as Challenger of Record was submitted
to the new Arbitration Panel.
Under 24.2 of the new Protocol, the yet to be publicly
announced entity has been reconstituted for the
33rd America’s Cup, but membership is reduced to
three.
The Swiss Professor Henry Peter was appointed as
Chairman. One of the other Panel members is believed
to be Graham McKenzie (New Zealand) and a member
from the Host country, Spain. A three member Sailing
Jury has also been appointed.
A letter has been posted on the Golden Gate Yacht
Club website responding to an unsigned note from
Professor Henry Peter (SUI)received by the Yacht
Club, advising of the intentions of both the Defender
and Challenger. The intention was also referred
to by Alinghi officials at the America’s Cup press
conference in Valencia earlier this week.
"The format and process set up for this arbitration
in The Protocol Governing the Thirty Third America’s
Cup ('Protocol') violate the most basic principles
of justice and independence common to all legitimate
adjudicatory bodies and are an affront to the most
basic sensibilities common to all law abiding people",
said GGYC letter. "A dispute resolution proceeding
in which the parties to the proceeding are in agreement
(in this case CNEV and SNG), and in which the judges
may be removed, and the rules of procedure may be
changed, at any time and for any reason by the parties
to the arbitration, will be viewed by the public
and the sailing community as nothing more than a
kangaroo court".
"In fact, (...) the New York courts have the authority
to interpret the trust instrument, the Deed of Gift,
and determine whether a successor trustee, in this
case SNG, has complied with its terms", wrote James
V Keraney, Counsel to Golden Gate Yacht Club.
Nevertheless, several outcomes are possible from
the Hearing, one of which may be to refer the matter
for determination by the Courts, as Societe Nautique
de Geneve SNG is entitled to do so, as Defender
under Clause 35 of the Protocol.
The initiation of proceedings to the Arbitration
Panel could also be the opening gambit in a move
to exclude Golden Gate YC from the 33rd America's
Cup, as if the panel elect not to send the matter
onto the New York Supreme Court but make a determination
in the matter themselves, then SNG could invoke
Sections 35 and 2.7(d) of the Protocol which prohibit
any Challenger from resorting to any other court
or tribunal. And, the latter Clause gives SNG the
contentious right to disqualify and Challenger if
they dispute the binding effect or the Protocol.
Another outcome could be that the Arbitration Panel
decides that CNEV are not qualified to be the Challenger
of Record. In this case Clause 3.3 of the Protocol
would come into effect, where CNEV would either
withdraw or be disqualified as COR and then either
a new or existing Challenger can be selected by
SNG. Or, the next Challenger to submit a Notice
of Entry would be selected.
However the Challenge from Golden Gate YC was the
second lodged after the Club Nautico Espanol de
Vela.
|